Thursday 16 July 2009 11.28am
Why was it refused last time?
1) The proposals by reason of design, massing and siting would be harmful to the amenities of neighbouring residential occupiers in terms of loss of sunlight/daylight, outlook and increased visual intrusion, and would result in an overbearing and incongruous form of development when viewed from the north. As such, it is considered to be contrary to policy 3.2 Protection of Amenity, 3.11 Efficient use of land, 3.12 Quality of Design and 3.13 Urban design of the Southwark Plan (UDP) July 2007, SPD Residential Development 2008 and policies 4A.3 Sustainable design and construction, 4B.1 Design principles for a compact city and 4B.3 Enhancing the quality of the public realm of the London Plan 2004.
AS quoted on southwark panning website after searching 199 long lane