Why has the Chambers Wharf development stopped?

Join in these discussions today! Log in or register.
cathal Thursday 14 October 2010 7.35pm
There hasn't been any building work taking place on the Chambers Wharf development for months. I walked down Chambers Street today and there's no sign of anyone. Does anyone know why this is? I'm wondering if this is a scheduled pause or a result of the economy.
TAK Thursday 14 October 2010 11.37pm
I'm purely speculating, but would guess it's indeed the economy.
Maybe they didn't start to sell any apartments at the right time and just stopped.

I was thinking the same about the building at Aldwich - opposite Hotel nr1 Aldwich.
It's been looking the same without progress for months and months now.
James Hatts Friday 15 October 2010 4.27pm
The formal decision notice granting planning permission has only been issued in the last week.

It seems that St Martin Property Corporation prevaricated about signing the section 106 agreement (payments to mitigate the impact of development on local residents) until the last possible moment.

Chambers Wharf was on the agenda for Tuesday night's planning committee with a recommendation that planning permission be refused because the s106 agreement hadn't been signed, despite the committee having voted in favour of granting permission several years ago.

Lo and behold the agreement was finally signed just before Tuesday's meeting and the council has issued the decision notice giving permission for the development.

Editor of the London SE1 website and SE1 Direct newsletter
TAK Saturday 16 October 2010 12.15am
James Hatts wrote:
The formal decision notice granting planning permission has only been issued in the last week.
It seems that St Martin Property Corporation prevaricated about signing the section 106 agreement (payments to mitigate the impact of development on local residents) until the last possible moment.

Chambers Wharf was on the agenda for Tuesday night's planning committee with a recommendation that planning permission be refused because the s106 agreement hadn't been signed, despite the committee having voted in favour of granting permission several years ago.

Lo and behold the agreement was finally signed just before Tuesday's meeting and the council has issue the decision notice giving permission for the development.

Thank you James - very interesting.
Do you know if the signed section 106 agreement is as originally proposed or if the developer has managed to reduce it in order to make the scheme 'viable' under current economic circumstances?


To post a message, you must be a registered user. If you are already registered, please log in.

Subscribe now

For the latest local news and events direct to your inbox every Monday, you need our weekly email newsletter SE1 Direct.

7,300+ locals read it every week. Can you afford to miss out?

Read the latest issue before signing up

Also on the forum

Views expressed in this discussion forum are those of the contributors and may not reflect the editorial policy of this website. Please read our terms and conditions