THE TIMES
Michael Place Tuesday 3 July 2012 1.32pm
Can you believe THE TIMES?
Last week on Friday June 29th The Times said in a leader that "the new RAF Bomber Command Memorial was unveiled by the Queen in Hyde Park".
Elsewhere in the same issue it mentioned "the memorial site at Green Park". (Green Park is a tube station).
In fact the new RAF Bomber Command Memorial is in The Green Park. Fortunately the Queen knew this.
So you definitely cannot believe THE TIMES.
Any other examples to share?
Last week on Friday June 29th The Times said in a leader that "the new RAF Bomber Command Memorial was unveiled by the Queen in Hyde Park".
Elsewhere in the same issue it mentioned "the memorial site at Green Park". (Green Park is a tube station).
In fact the new RAF Bomber Command Memorial is in The Green Park. Fortunately the Queen knew this.
So you definitely cannot believe THE TIMES.
Any other examples to share?
beetroot Tuesday 3 July 2012 1.41pm
What on Earth were you reading the Times for?
The memorial's great. The figures 'accessories' are made as seperate pieces and attached so there's much more detail than you could get with the usual casting.
The memorial's great. The figures 'accessories' are made as seperate pieces and attached so there's much more detail than you could get with the usual casting.
se1lurker Tuesday 3 July 2012 2.15pm
Were the flags the right way round?
Michael Place Tuesday 3 July 2012 3.48pm
They were, and even better City Hall now has three amazingly clean and bright flags flying from its flagpoles!!!
Debrajoan Wednesday 4 July 2012 12.18pm
Michael Place wrote:Can you believe THE TIMES?
Last week on Friday June 29th The Times said in a leader that "the new RAF Bomber Command Memorial was unveiled by the Queen in Hyde Park".
Elsewhere in the same issue it mentioned "the memorial site at Green Park". (Green Park is a tube station).
In fact the new RAF Bomber Command Memorial is in The Green Park. Fortunately the Queen knew this.
So you definitely cannot believe THE TIMES.
Any other examples to share?
Unsure of your point here Michael, Green Park is indeed a tube station, but the memorial IS is in Green Park, which is bounded by Queens Walk, Piccadilly, and Constitution Hill.
I'm not trying to be pedantic, but to most Londoners Green Park is the park first, the station second I think.
beetroot Wednesday 4 July 2012 2.55pm
I think Michael's point was about the word 'the' being missing.
JonR Thursday 5 July 2012 11.01am
according to 'The Royal Parks' website http://www.royalparks.org.uk/parks/green-park/ there is no article 'the' infront of it.
I rarely believe newspapers - especially Times.
[edit to add] - I've read this section of The Royal Parks website, and actually there seems to be a lack of continuity - sometimes it's written as 'The Green Park', and sometimes just as 'Green Park', there doesn't seem to be a definitive answer as to if the definite article 'The' should be there or not!
I rarely believe newspapers - especially Times.
[edit to add] - I've read this section of The Royal Parks website, and actually there seems to be a lack of continuity - sometimes it's written as 'The Green Park', and sometimes just as 'Green Park', there doesn't seem to be a definitive answer as to if the definite article 'The' should be there or not!
longlaner Thursday 5 July 2012 3.20pm
Regent's Park is "officially" The Regent's Park, but I'd expect to get a funny look if I called it that. The same applies to Green Park.
Michael Place Friday 6 July 2012 9.51am
Here is the reply to my enquiry to the Ordnance Survey:
"Just for reference here are all the Royal Parks in London:
St James’s Park
The Green Park
Hyde Park
Kensington Gardens
Richmond Park
Greenwich Park
The Regent’s Park
Bushy Park"
"Just for reference here are all the Royal Parks in London:
St James’s Park
The Green Park
Hyde Park
Kensington Gardens
Richmond Park
Greenwich Park
The Regent’s Park
Bushy Park"
To post a message, you must be a registered user. If you are already registered, please log in.

