Wednesday 3 September 2008 2.41pm
Please someone define in which executive respects Obama is better qualified than Sarah Palin for a CEO's role?
He seems cleverer, to have better judgement, to be a better communicator, to have a better grasp of foreign affairs.
You'd actually vote for Palin ahead of Obama is she were the Presidential candidate?!
You seem at a loss to answer the question. Obama has no executive experience other than running for President, which is a circular argument. Palin has the most executive experience of any of the four - a low bar anyway in this election. That's just a fact not an opinion. Obama's grasp of foreign affairs is to threaten to invade Pakistan, negotiate unconditionally with A'jad and apologize to Europeans for America's supposed shortcomings.
Maurits, conservatives in general, but especially in America, are far less prurient and censorious than liberals. The liberal view that Republicans would be horrified by the teenage pregnancy of a politician's daughter is laughable.
Not only would I vote for Sarah Palin over Obama, I'd vote for Michael Palin over Obama.