<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>SE1 Discussion</title>
    <link>http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/list/1</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Anything and everything to do with life in London's SE1 area. Discuss local restaurants, pubs, plays, exhibitions, shops, services, transport, planning, history, books and much more.]]></description>
    <language>EN</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:40:22 +0100</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:40:22 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <category>SE1 Discussion</category>
    <generator>Phorum 5.1.6</generator>
    <ttl>600</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Waterloo Bridge works</title>
      <link>http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/124628#msg-124628</link>
      <author>forum@london-se1.co.uk (Sidi)</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I am not sure if this helps, but I can asure you this sort of things do not happen only in Britain. The Swiss are absolutely capable to do the same. Zürich even managed to get into the newspaper as there must be as many road works as in London and if they finish one street they open it again in two weeks time, just to do few things. Reason why is: if they do not spend the whole money which they got in the budget, they will get less for the next year..<br />
So no, it is not only Britain the other countries near by do the same, which is of corse no excuse.<br />
There should be a bigger change in politics, but this is probably another subject.]]></description>
      <category>SE1 Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/124628#msg-124628</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:40:22 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Waterloo Bridge works</title>
      <link>http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/124615#msg-124615</link>
      <author>forum@london-se1.co.uk (darrenm)</author>
      <description><![CDATA[debrajoan, the $64 (million?) answer is that they don't give a sh*t, that's the country we live in. tfl and local councils employ contractors to resurface roads etc, which mainly involves lazy blokes standing around smoking a ciggie and gawping at women walking by. when the job is &quot;done&quot; they know it will need re-doing again in 6 months time, cos they've done it so badly, and it keeps everybody in work (omg perhaps there's positive side!) i've said it before and i'll say it again, welcome to rip-off britain (at taxpayers expense). ps: can someone start a new thread and tell me what we (great britain) are very good at (in chatter obviously). thanks : )]]></description>
      <category>SE1 Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/124615#msg-124615</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:53:20 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Waterloo Bridge works</title>
      <link>http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/124614#msg-124614</link>
      <author>forum@london-se1.co.uk (Debrajoan)</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I don't think that it is unfair to say that TFL, rather than having little or no interest in ensuring, (or at least trying to ensure), that traffic flows as freely as is possible in London, would appear to have a great more deal of interest in bringing the capital to a shuddering halt, or of certainly turning a blind eye as London does so.<br />
The $64 question is why?]]></description>
      <category>SE1 Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/124614#msg-124614</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:08:06 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Waterloo Bridge works</title>
      <link>http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/124591#msg-124591</link>
      <author>forum@london-se1.co.uk (urbanite)</author>
      <description><![CDATA[When everyone works out that TfL have little or no interest in ensuring traffic flow in London, and are hell bent on making life beyond difficult for all road users then we will all be much happier!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description>
      <category>SE1 Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/124591#msg-124591</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:27:52 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Waterloo Bridge works</title>
      <link>http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/124575#msg-124575</link>
      <author>forum@london-se1.co.uk (wjfox2004)</author>
      <description><![CDATA[^ Indeed. The congestion was terrible this morning... :(]]></description>
      <category>SE1 Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/124575#msg-124575</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:04:59 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Waterloo Bridge works</title>
      <link>http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/124514#msg-124514</link>
      <author>forum@london-se1.co.uk (La Martinet)</author>
      <description><![CDATA[So now they have also shut the Strand underpass for &quot;urgent maintenance&quot;, thereby doubling the problem. I think the sign said for four weeks...<br />
<br />
It is probably quicker to swim across now. <br />
<br />
Words fail me...]]></description>
      <category>SE1 Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/124514#msg-124514</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:00:03 +0100</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Waterloo Bridge works</title>
      <link>http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123333#msg-123333</link>
      <author>forum@london-se1.co.uk (La Martinet)</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Ha - Perhaps they read this forum!<br />
<br />
I thank JonR for explaining the vagaries of council finance and contracts, etc. but I still wonder why exceptions cannot be made for certain circumstances and sites.<br />
<br />
Ye gods, a year!  I'm sure the rest of the world laugh at us. The Romans would have done it quicker, and from scratch!]]></description>
      <category>SE1 Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123333#msg-123333</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Waterloo Bridge works</title>
      <link>http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123332#msg-123332</link>
      <author>forum@london-se1.co.uk (James Hatts)</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Westminster City Council has put up signs at the foot of the bridge on the South Bank:<br />
[center][img]http://www.london-se1.co.uk/images/100302_waterloobridge.jpg[/img][/center]]]></description>
      <category>SE1 Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123332#msg-123332</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Waterloo Bridge works</title>
      <link>http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123283#msg-123283</link>
      <author>forum@london-se1.co.uk (Phil_R)</author>
      <description><![CDATA[By the way, I seem to remember Blackfriars Bridge being given a 'makeover' which lasted 18 months. That was 5 or 6 years ago. They needn't have bothered. Do Planners talk to other Planners?]]></description>
      <category>SE1 Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123283#msg-123283</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Waterloo Bridge works</title>
      <link>http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123282#msg-123282</link>
      <author>forum@london-se1.co.uk (Phil_R)</author>
      <description><![CDATA[And this disruption will be until December of this year!!! 11 months!!! Unbelievable.]]></description>
      <category>SE1 Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123282#msg-123282</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Waterloo Bridge works</title>
      <link>http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123214#msg-123214</link>
      <author>forum@london-se1.co.uk (James Hatts)</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Waterloo Bridge is maintained by Westminster Council:<br />
<br />
http://www.itv.com/london/waterloo-bridge04935/]]></description>
      <category>SE1 Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123214#msg-123214</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Waterloo Bridge works</title>
      <link>http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123212#msg-123212</link>
      <author>forum@london-se1.co.uk (Tolstoy)</author>
      <description><![CDATA[&quot;With apologies...&quot;]]></description>
      <category>SE1 Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123212#msg-123212</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Waterloo Bridge works</title>
      <link>http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123210#msg-123210</link>
      <author>forum@london-se1.co.uk (Tolstoy)</author>
      <description><![CDATA[The scale of economics yes, but surely the 'fault' is with the tax payer. Imagine the outrage of your average Mail reader if the higher bid is accepted. It's the same as when people complain about health care in this country and then cite the wonders of services under the scandinavian system. You get what you prepared to pay and unfortunately we've been [i]educated[/i] to believe that the market will always deliver. Inevitably this means cheap, not better service. <br />
<br />
We apologies for any inconvenience caused. Blame Milton Friedman.]]></description>
      <category>SE1 Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123210#msg-123210</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Waterloo Bridge works</title>
      <link>http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123208#msg-123208</link>
      <author>forum@london-se1.co.uk (Debrajoan)</author>
      <description><![CDATA[[quote La Martinet] I suspect that in any other city, a swarm of workers would be brought in to work 24 hours  in shifts to get the job done in a matter of days. <br />
<br />
<br />
Exasperated of Southwark.[/quote]<br />
<br />
This subject was brought up at a dinner party that I attended some months ago.<br />
A civil engineer in attendance explained it like this, &quot;It is all in the costing, a council or body will put a specific job out to tender.<br />
Bloggs and Co. will offer to do the job for let's say £500,000, and says it will take two weeks.<br />
Briggs and Co. tender an estimate of £500,010, but say that they will work around the clock and estimate one week to complete the job.&quot;<br />
The job will go to Bloggs because their bill will be £10.00 cheaper, the fact that traffic will be delayed for two weeks instead of just one is of no consequence to the bean counters, they will be content that they have saved the council £10.00.]]></description>
      <category>SE1 Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123208#msg-123208</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Waterloo Bridge works</title>
      <link>http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123165#msg-123165</link>
      <author>forum@london-se1.co.uk (JonR)</author>
      <description><![CDATA[Waterloo Bridge, is if I recall corectly, TFL Red Route - so Transport For London, rather than a London Borough.<br />
There are restrictions on all road works as to when they're allowed to do work.  Generally not during rush hour, or before a certain time am, or after a certain time pm.  When doing work on site, the barriers are widened, to give the workers more room, and this causes more traffic congestion, also large vehicles delivering/removing plant, tools, machinery, materiels, etc cause more congestion.  These movements are restricted to out of rush hour times.<br />
<br />
essentially this means that when the vast majority of people are going past road works, there isn't actually any work being done.<br />
<br />
all works require permits.  24 hour working would require overtime payments - yes work would get done quicker, but then gangs would have no work to do between, when one years money runs out, and April 1st, when they start again.<br />
Also with lots or road works happening, your subcontracted gang or workers can't be everywhere at once.<br />
<br />
I personally agree that roads should be worked on 24 hours a day if possible, to get stuff done quicker, and reduce the amount of time (no of days) that traffic management is in place, but there are restrictions in place.  one of the biggest is the amount of noise you're allowed to make while on site.<br />
(not applicable on Waterloo bridge necessarily)<br />
<br />
hope that helps.]]></description>
      <category>SE1 Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123165#msg-123165</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Waterloo Bridge works</title>
      <link>http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123164#msg-123164</link>
      <author>forum@london-se1.co.uk (La Martinet)</author>
      <description><![CDATA[I cross this bridge twice a day.  Since the work started, I have seen no more than seven men working on it.  This many is only of late, too.  For the first few weeks, I only ever saw three at a time, on rare occasions rising to five.  They seem to spend a lot of time standing about, as seems common to most roadworkers. And they are all finished for the day by at least 5.30 despite having some floodlights to allow for night working.<br />
<br />
How can it be that in one of the world's most advanced cities, on one of the main river crossings, that this can be allowed to happen?  I suspect that in any other city, a swarm of workers would be brought in to work 24 hours  in shifts to get the job done in a matter of days. <br />
<br />
Admittedly, I have no idea what they are actually supposed to be doing apart from what looks like resurfacing, but how can it be allowed to take six months or whatever it's meant to?<br />
<br />
Incidentally, which council is responsible for the bridge? Or is it a joint affair?<br />
<br />
Exasperated of Southwark.]]></description>
      <category>SE1 Discussion</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.london-se1.co.uk/forum/read/1/123164/123164#msg-123164</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
