London SE1 community website

Public toilets on Tooley Street

Join in these discussions today! Log in or register.
Pages:  1 2 Next
Current: 1 of 2
Friday 16 April 2010 8.48pm
An application has been received by SC to demolish these and for a restaurant to be built on the land.
Monday 19 April 2010 10.38am
Hello Gavin - do you know if the application involves the removal of the Ernest Bevin bust or the Samuel Bevington statue? Both have been landmarks in Tooley Street for many years and any plan that involves their removal should be closely scrutinised.
Monday 19 April 2010 10.53am
Yes, those toilets are not worth saving (unlike the ones that are now The Island Cafe on Union Street) but obviously the statues are important. I can't imagine they'd be under any threat though.
Monday 19 April 2010 11.08am
This is the planning application - 10/AP/0721 (sorry, not sure how to link to it). The statues are not going to be touched and three of the four trees will remain, with only the scrappy little tree closest to the bank being removed.
Monday 19 April 2010 11.19am
A very similar application was submitted last year then withdrawn

Editor of the London SE1 website.
Subscribe to our SE1 Direct weekly newsletter.
Monday 19 April 2010 1.30pm
The statue wasn't mentioned in the application and so I think this will survive intact.

However, the appearance of any new building needs to be sympathetic to the rest of Tooley Street. In addition, there is at present public seating around the toilets and this ought to be preserved.
Monday 19 April 2010 7.01pm
Yes it is not just reassurance about the monuments that is needed, but also public access to them. I have contacted Planners to clarify this and will let you know what they say. Reason I am concerned is that about five or six years ago there was talk of building on the site and it was suggested Bevin's bust be moved. As experience tells us these sort of ideas don't always go away!

I guess you will all know this but it was put there back in May 1955 following a public subscription,and was unveiled by Clement Attlee.
Monday 19 April 2010 7.13pm
I've always thought the statue and benches looked a bit neglected, or a at least have untapped potential. It could be a really nice little spot.
There's going to be a lot more demand for lunch places when all the skyscrapers go up.
(I mistyped 'lynch places' then. Freudian slip)
Monday 19 April 2010 8.13pm
they do look a bit neglected, Beetroot, and could indeed be made into a nice place. However, as Pat points out, it is vitally important that access to the statue and the benches remains free for all, and not contingent on purchasing bad food from an overpriced restaurant (such as is the case with Butlers Wharf where a public right of way was unilaterally removed). Done tastefully and with due respect to prior-standing facilities/historic points (as well as the bust, if I'm not mistaken from the Ordnance Survey map, there used to be a water trough at the point of the toilets for horses and something of a cross roads (long before the days of Tower Bridge and TBR). What we don't want is some yellow-bricked monstrosity (sic).
Monday 19 April 2010 8.34pm
You are right Beetroot, there is potential for interpretation of both the Bevin and Bevington memorials. The former was widely recognised as a key member of Churchill's wartime cabinet as well as a major trade unionist, and the latter was a very important contributor to life in Bermondsey through his leather tanning business and his many social activities, as well as being its first Mayor. Why not tell our local community and the passing public more about these men? Might the Planners help here I wonder?
Pages:  1 2 Next
Current: 1 of 2

To post a message, please log in or register..
We are part of
Independent Community News Network
Email newsletter

For the latest local news and events direct to your inbox every Monday, you need our weekly email newsletter SE1 Direct.

7,000+ locals read it every week. Can you afford to miss out?

Read the latest issue before signing up

Also on the forum
Views expressed in this discussion forum are those of the contributors and may not reflect the editorial policy of this website. Please read our terms and conditions