Ivanhoe wrote:Oh, the name thing (again). In the wake of a sensible comment, it's always handy to trot out something so dumb it saps the will to live.
There are plenty of people on here who know my face, name, phone number, address, family details, job details, etc. I'm not hiding them. More like judiciously filtering them from e.g. right wing loonies.
And, frankly, if my username DID bear a resemblance to a "real" name, are there really people who are so naive that they would take that as any sort of proof of who I really am? I hope it's not a newsflash, but people aren't always who they claim to be.
And as for the AIDS denialism, that's surely a bit far-fetched for even a Daily "Life gives you cancer" Mail/Telegraph reader like you, Mother Rkadams99
nigelse1 wrote:A few thoughts for Mark
- if HIV-AIDS is 'far from proven' to quote you, how
can it be 'mostly self-inflicted in the west', to
quote you again?
nigelse1 wrote:Do you understand the phrase "Kudos for your charity" ?and lastly if your theories are correct and I would respectfully suggest they are rubbish surely philpott's charitable efforts to help save lives, however endangered, should be praised - after all even 40% of £2,000 is £800 to those in need
For the latest local news and events direct to your inbox every Monday, you need our weekly email newsletter SE1 Direct.
7,000+ locals read it every week. Can you afford to miss out?
Read the latest issue before signing up