mikec wrote:Incidentally, despite all of G Browns failings, it's stretching the bounds of plausibility to assert that he could have been solely responsible for the largest financial crash since 1929. I'm no Labour party member, but pinning a financial crash caused by the failure of an insanely complex derivatives/securities market on one man is, well, wrong. I'd say that's much closer to reality. I'm deeply sorry you've lost your job, btw.
For the latest local news and events direct to your inbox every Monday, you need our weekly email newsletter SE1 Direct.
7,000+ locals read it every week. Can you afford to miss out?
Read the latest issue before signing up