denis loretto wrote:I do not understand the post from James Hatts. No-one is saying that there are no plans to replace - and indeed increase - residential development.
James Hatts wrote:We're in danger of going over the same ideological ground that has been covered in lots of other threads.
Please could we keep this thread a bit more closely focussed on the specific site on Blackfriars Road described in the opening posts?
Feel free to start other thread(s) to discuss wider issues - or use one of the other more general threads from recent months discussing housing.
Quote:There's a bloody quote at the top of James' post Denis. It's in a box (in your defence, probably an UN affordable one, owned by a child-eating foreigner. But definitely not empty). In it suziq says of the development that 'no replacement housing is planned, apart from the alms houses, just yet more office space'. You can put her down as the 'no-one' he's responding to.
boroughonian wrote:To think it unfair that people should be turfed from their homes is a perfectly reasonable position, especially if you live in one of them.
denis loretto wrote:For the avoidance of misunderstanding I am referring to the general, immediate and pervasive threat that our City in general ...
For the latest local news and events direct to your inbox every Monday, you need our weekly email newsletter SE1 Direct.
7,000+ locals read it every week. Can you afford to miss out?
Read the latest issue before signing up