CJG wrote:I suspect the developers will have had to pay the council more than the cost of incorporating social housing into their scheme, and in doing so will have facilitated a greater number of net social units. It might be socioeconomically divisive, but on Balance I don't have a problem with the idea of developers paying over the odds to not have social housing in their more exclusive schemes.
For the latest local news and events direct to your inbox every Monday, you need our weekly email newsletter SE1 Direct.
7,000+ locals read it every week. Can you afford to miss out?
Read the latest issue before signing up