Ivanhoe wrote:Oh stuff it...why don't we just pave over the Thames entirely? It only gets in the way, doesn't it?
eDWaRD WooDWaRD wrote:Ivanhoe wrote:Oh stuff it...why don't we just pave over the Thames entirely? It only gets in the way, doesn't it?
As one of London's main attractions, that would defy the purpose, no?
qwerty wrote:National Theatre loos are built for the National Theatre; Wonderground loos are installed for the Wonderground; London Eye loos are ... you got it! For the London Eye. A new tourist attraction needs to support it's potential FOUR million + visitors without relying on existing resources which are stretched already... common sense I would've thought.
For the latest local news and events direct to your inbox every Monday, you need our weekly email newsletter SE1 Direct.
7,000+ locals read it every week. Can you afford to miss out?
Read the latest issue before signing up