London SE1 community website

Friends of Archbishops Park AGM

Join in these discussions today! Log in or register.
Saturday 12 June 2004 7.42pm
We are having an AGM in the China Walk Hall, on Lambeth Walk at 7.00pm on Monday 7 July.

We have a number of good new prospective Committee members, but could always do with more. Now we have a lease for the park and a management plan written, there is real opportunity to capture investment money and really make a difference.

If you are interested in the park, green issues more generally or in gaining funding expertise, do contact me. One of the barriers to us gaining regeneration funding is the fact the the local community regeneration fund is concerned that we as a group lack expertise and capacity. ********* of course but if anyone out there is up to speed we could do with your help. (I see Rabbie in a special 'guru' slot.)

Much love,

PS we are about to have access to some buildings formally occupied by Team Lambeth. Maybe there will be space to store a cider press........
Monday 14 June 2004 8.39am
Can't find an editing facility. I meant Monday 5 July.

Do come!

Monday 14 June 2004 3.20pm

what do you want to do with the park?
Wednesday 16 June 2004 5.53pm

Please read your private messages - can't email you at present!

Thursday 17 June 2004 11.30am

again, what do you want to do with the park?

perhaps I may be able to help?
Friday 18 June 2004 10.02am
Lots - come to our AGM!

I think I have posted most of the history on the forum at various stages. However in brief.

- we started in 2000 to fight off proposals to build a private tennis centre on the park. Our aims are to preserve and protect the park and to encourage its use.
- discovered that the lease (Church Commissioners own, Lambeth has the lease) had run out and so the land was available for development, plus there was lots of regeneration and other money in the area.
- got a professional management plan drawn up which includes 40 proposals to update facilities in the park (cafe, toilets, smaller but better play equipment, safety features, and effectively make up for 25 years of no investment - for example the play equipment is now 15 years old when normal lifespan is only 7 years.)
- managed to pursuade the Church Commissioners that a policy of simply sitting there without a lease until they had the chance of developing the land was not a good policy as it was preventing any investment. (Simon Hughes and Kate Hoey asked questions in parliament and were preparing an early day motion.)
- now we are working with quite a lot of people to implement parts of the management plan.

We have done our best through consultation events, user interviews, and targetted questioning to make sure we have picked up the views and concerns of the range of park users. It has never been the intention of Friends of Archbishops Park to dictate what should happen, but instead enable park users to determine the future of the park.

Hope that helps.


Saturday 3 July 2004 9.14am
Roll-up roll-up and come along.

Seriously a good turn out will help. We are in the process of trying to capture some of the money that is out there so that local kids can have a really good playground. Sounds simple, but round here things are never that easy.

So if you know anyone with kids, or are interested in supporting a straight forward community ambition do come along, or join our group. Post a message to me and I will send you an application.

Now we have a lease on the park, the playground is my only ambition. A memorial to the days when I decided to put my head above the parapet and campaign. Then a happy retirement with a gallon of Bankcider......

To post a message, please log in or register..
We are part of
Independent Community News Network
Email newsletter

For the latest local news and events direct to your inbox every Monday, you need our weekly email newsletter SE1 Direct.

7,000+ locals read it every week. Can you afford to miss out?

Read the latest issue before signing up

Also on the forum
Views expressed in this discussion forum are those of the contributors and may not reflect the editorial policy of this website. Please read our terms and conditions