London SE1 community website

Re: Sainsbury's

Join in these discussions today! Log in or register.
Wednesday 21 March 2001 5.03pm
Much of London is characterised by extremely unremarkable modern office blocks. Many of the blocks built around Tower 42 (for example) are drab compromises, examples of people's thwarted ambitions. Architects have been forced to turn potentially graceful, slim, landmark buildings into stumpy disappointments. Why be afraid of Land Mark buildings? The Victorians showed a determination to put London on the architectural world map with land mark structures like St Pancras station. We may not be self confident Empire builders now a days, but that is no reason to treat London like a musiem, consigning its greatness to the past. London must continue to be a vibrant, prosperous, exciting, "dense and intense" place, that continues to attract the World's best companies? Build the tower at London Bridge and a hundred more like it. Moreover, what is particularly good about the London Bridge Tower is that it removes one of these disappointing examples of London's current building ethos. Hight creates an interesting landscape providing a focus for the surrounding community. If you want a view of Canary Wharf tower, you have to pay a premium for it, if you want a view of the new British Library, expect to save several year's salary.
Friday 12 January 2001 9.28am
Hi, I agree too many forums. I live opposite southwark tube and don't know if the South Bank, Bankside or E&C forum is most appropriate. And anyway where is Waterloo?

To post a message, please log in or register..
Keep up with SE1 news

We have three email newsletters for you to choose from:

We are part of
Independent Community News Network
Email newsletter

For the latest local news and events direct to your inbox every Monday, you need our weekly email newsletter SE1 Direct.

7,000+ locals read it every week. Can you afford to miss out?

Read the latest issue before signing up

Also on the forum
Views expressed in this discussion forum are those of the contributors and may not reflect the editorial policy of this website. Please read our terms and conditions